Poll: Businesses are Wanting In-House Conduct Circuit Board Prototyping
Polling of printed circuit board (PCB) designers and makers, electrical engineers, OEMs and others excited about 3D-printed PCBs and circuits reveals that there is certainly escalating demand for in-house prototyping for research and product development. The desire is extremely keen amongst firms that spend as much or more than $100,000 per year for prototyping assistance.
Of the in excess of 975 participants – standing for 31 industries and disciplines and 25 nations around the world – getting involved in the investigation directed by Nano Dimension Ltd., 70 % expend as much as $50,000 and 14 percent pointed out they spend more than $50,000 each year on circuit card prototyping. Also, a full 16 percent, or 142 respondents, are paying in excess of $100,000 to contracted-out prototyping suppliers every year. Most answerers clarified that the prototyping costs were excessive because they need the fabrication of complicated, multi-layer circuit cards – with 66 % of those interviewed indicating their designs include multiple layers.
While upwards of 9 in 10 participants explained their establishments rely upon off-site prototyping factories currently, nearly two in three claimed they think their intellectual property (IP) is in jeopardy whenever they do it. Most say they really wish ways for printing their own circuit cards inside.
“Designers and technical engineers definitely prefer shorter turn-around times and lower risk every time dispatching their design information for prototyping,” said Simon Fried, Nano Dimension’s CBO and a company co-founder. “But with most of the manufacturing houses in China, timeliness is rarely an option. The fact is that, sometimes they end up with circuit boards for production that are not enhanced as much as they want on account of the long lead times. And sending out designs generally raises the chances which the IP could be duplicated or robbed.”
Even though the prototyping houses are fully known partners, the time constraints involved with outsourcing can stifle creativity. Lots of designers rely upon “safe” circuit board designs instead of exploring innovative new ideas in case they may result in multiple iterations – and additional delays – with the prototyping facility.
“With progressive alternatives just like Nano Dimension’s DragonFly 2020 3D Printer, the electronics can finally catch up to other forms of manufacturing that have benefited from additive manufacturing,” Fried said. “Our survey demonstrates the demand is there, and the market is ready for 3D-printed circuit boards that can be produced on-site soon and cost-effectively.”
Nano Dimension, a frontrunner in 3D printed electronics, hosts the survey on its website. Respondents stand for industries covering everything from electronic circuit board makers and OEMs to engineering, defense, manufacturing, aerospace, electronics, medical, detectors and wearables, telecommunications, energy and the like.